Since my last update on my “newish political model” I have continued trying it out on different political positions and playing with new ways to conceive the various dimensions, and I’ve developed a slightly new (and, I think, improved) way of thinking about it. The difference is in the way I am thinking about the Fraternity dimension.
If you remember my descriptions of Liberty and Equality, you might want to skip to Fraternity.
Liberty (individual autonomy): freedom of individuals versus authority of collectivities. Who determines how individuals are to think, feel and act?
+) an individual alone determines individual being;
-) the collectivity determines individual being;
0) at the center an individual determines individual being within reasonable limits set by a collectivity.
What kinds of collectivity are we talking about? According to this model any group capable of imposing its will on an individual is considered a collectivity capable of curtailing individual liberty. This differs from Political Compass, which views liberty as curtailed primarily by the federal government.
And what are reasonable limits? That is a matter of perpetual debate and dialogue to be continuously re-determined by Centrists.
Equality (power distribution): desirability of equality versus desirability of rank. How much disparity of power among individuals is acceptable and ideal?
+) each individual is given the same power and resources as every other;
-) each individual is given different amounts of power and resources according to rank;
0) at the center every individual is guaranteed a fair opportunity to acquire power and resources.
What kinds of rank are we talking about? According to this model every value system ranks differently and imposes rank according to its own logic. Societies can rank-stratify by family, class, wealth, race, education, talent, temperament, party membership — anything to which the word “deserve” can be applied. This differs from Political Compass, which casts equality issues in terms of government regulation.
And what is fair? That is a matter of perpetual debate and dialogue to be continuously re-determined by Centrists.
Fraternity (membership in political order ): essentially universal membership versus essentially exclusive obligation.
+) membership in a universal political order is automatically extended to all of humanity;
-) membership in a particular political order is restricted to a group defined by involuntary essential characteristics ;
0) at the center potential membership in a particular political order is universal, and actual membership is entirely voluntary (and not defined by essential characteristics).