Category Archives: ANT

Ancestors and siblings of process thought

While I’m scanning passages from C. Robert Mesle’s Process-Relational Philosophy, here are two more that inspired me. The first passage appeals to my designer consciousness: Descartes was wrong in his basic dualism. The world is not composed of substances or of … Continue reading

Posted in ANT, Design, Fables, myths & parables, Hermeneutics, Holism, Judaism, Symbols and diagrams | Leave a comment

Luria-Latour

The book I have been reading for the last thirty or so mornings has been Gershom Scholem’s Major Trends in Jewish Mysticism. I am currently reading the chapter on Isaac Luria, and it is sparking insights and connections with other things I’ve read, in particular with … Continue reading

Posted in ANT, Judaism | Leave a comment

The Republic of Reality

represent |repri-zent| verb [with obj.]  be entitled or appointed to act or speak for (someone), especially in an official capacity. constitute; amount to. depict (a particular subject) in a picture or other work of art formal state or point out … Continue reading

Posted in ANT, Design, Politics | Leave a comment

Wordworlds

Nothing is improved when we replace worldviews with wordworlds. To paraphrase Bernadette from the Jerk, “It’s not [the meanings] I’ll miss. It’s the stuff!” Our problem is not metaphysics. It is metaphysical reductionism. And specifically metaphysical reductionisms that allow us … Continue reading

Posted in ANT, Metaphysics, Philosophy, Pragmatism | Leave a comment

The medium of action

Had Hannah Arendt lived to read Shapin and Schaffer’s Leviathan and the Air-Pump: she would never have written this: With the term vita activa, I propose to designate three fundamental human activities: labor, work, and action. They are fundamental because each … Continue reading

Posted in ANT, Philosophy, Politics | Leave a comment

Circuits

Intersubjectivity is conducted through the medium of things. * I and You runs a circuit through It. Are things otherwise?: I is short-circuiting, again. An indicator of a closed circuit: intense heat. * Circuit – ORIGIN late Middle English: via … Continue reading

Posted in ANT, Etymology, Philosophy | Leave a comment

Protected: The truth next door

There is no excerpt because this is a protected post.

Posted in ANT, Design, Phenomenology, Philosophy, Pragmatism | Enter your password to view comments.

Universal respect

To disrespect the “mundane” obstacles that confront us in our attempts to meet our goals – to indignantly declare that some obstacles have no right to exist – to believe it is degrading to wrangle with them – such attitude … Continue reading

Posted in ANT, Ethics, Politics | Leave a comment

Miller/Latour: What religion does

I need to make friends with some fellow-nerds whose heads combust when they read stuff like this: Religion corrects for our farsightedness. It addresses the invisibility of objects that are commonly too familiar, too available, too immanent to be seen. … Continue reading

Posted in ANT | Leave a comment

Consolations of gnosis

I finished “Irreductions” from The Pasteurization of France. To me, Latour looks like the most rigorous and radical fusion of Nietzschean and Pragmatist I’ve read. * Superficially, Actor-Network Theory looks almost amoral, but Latour always inserts a moral at the … Continue reading

Posted in ANT, Ethics, Ideas | Leave a comment

Where politics has no rights

A hint at Latour’s ethic: We would like to be able to escape from politics. We would like there to be, somewhere, a way of knowing and convincing which differs from compromise and tinkering: a way of knowing that does … Continue reading

Posted in ANT, Ethics | Leave a comment

Irreductions

From the introduction to Latour’s Irreductions: …We should not decide apriori what the state of forces will be beforehand or what will count as a force. If the word “force” appears too mechanical or too bellicose, then we can talk … Continue reading

Posted in ANT | Leave a comment

Supposing truth converses…?

More attempts to internalize the ANTsy moves: Today, physicists never discuss a matter without allowing the matter to participate in the discussion. Physicist’s experiments always ask leading questions. The questions have a clear, coaxing thrust, and the matter in question … Continue reading

Posted in ANT | Leave a comment

Interview with a quark

If a physicist could talk directly with a quark to get hints from it that would help the physicist invent new productive theories and experiments, most physicists would get to work scheduling interviews with any quark willing to talk with … Continue reading

Posted in ANT, Ideas | Leave a comment

On Justification

Two reasons I am glad to have read Luc Boltanski’s On Justification: I have been looking for something like Boltanski’s Framework for Analyzing the Common Worlds for two years: basically a structure for describing a lifeworld/worldview. Boltanski’s descriptions of the … Continue reading

Posted in ANT, Ideas | Leave a comment

OPP

Obligatory Passage Point (OPP) is going to be a useful concept. From Wikipedia: Obligatory passage points are a feature of actor-networks, usually associated with the initial (problematization) phase of a translation process. An OPP can be thought of as the … Continue reading

Posted in ANT, Pragmatism | Leave a comment

From, for and within

Just as science is not really a body of knowledge on what is true about things, but rather the record of disciplined interactions human beings have with things, with a focus on the patterns that predictably occur when certain conditions … Continue reading

Posted in ANT, Pragmatism | Leave a comment

Usable philosophies

WARNING: THE FOLLOWING POST CONTAINS A COMPUTER ANALOGY APPLIED TO MIND [Apologies in advance]

Posted in ANT, Design, Pragmatism | Leave a comment

Crediting James

Graham Harman, from Prince of Networks: Bruno Latour and Metaphysics: We are now amused to think that there used to be two kinds of physics, one for the earth and one for the sky. But it is equally absurd that … Continue reading

Posted in ANT, Pragmatism | Leave a comment

Actor-network theory is practical pragmatism

Extending my post from a couple of days ago, “ANT = Practical pragmatism”: When you are temperamentally theoretical, it is tempting to stop at theorizing about practice, and never to practice anything but theorizing. When pragmatism begins to apply its … Continue reading

Posted in ANT, Pragmatism | Tagged | 1 Comment