Latour’s “pivot table” of modes of inquiry is made up of elements so deeply heterogeneous it feels like an anti-schema. The elements are included in the table specifically because they are “incommensurable” (though definitely relatable to one another), which means my usual geometrical mode of grasping schemas is useless. I’ve said before that unless I can draw something I haven’t understood it… this table is going to force me to find a new way/ways of understanding and relating ideas. It hurts in that way that raises my hopes.