Nobody wants the world to be unjust.

But different people regard justice very differently.

Whose vision of justice prevails? The objectively true one, right? — the one your opponent has been arguing for ages, but you will not accept because of your self-interest and lack of character.

*

Is it possible that there are unjust ways of determining what is just? And conversely, that our ways of determining what is just can become more just?

*

One principle frequently neglected by decriers of privilege and demander of fairness: it is fundamentally unjust and unfair to privilege certain visions of justice and fairness over others — no matter who imposes it.