Metanoia , T’shuvah, Poesis.

Instead of treating philosophy, religion and design as my primary themes for Enworldment, I could instead use: Metanoia , T’shuvah, Poesis. Philosophy, religion and design could serve as my points of departure into these themes.

T’shuvah and-or metanoia

This morning I am reflecting on the crucial difference between two words, clumsily translated into English as “repentance”, the Greek word metanoia (a transformation in how we think), and the Hebrew word t’shuvah (a turn to, or back to God). Almost certainly, the word used by John the Baptist and Jesus in the Gospels was … Continue reading T’shuvah and-or metanoia

Metanoia and the triad

A problem is coming into view for me. For the last two decades, it has seemed true to me that we have three fundamental factors that shape our being: The first factor is intuition, and intuition’s “object”, everyday, immediate givens — those real entities we encounter and interact with in the course of our practical … Continue reading Metanoia and the triad

Ideological conversion versus metanoia

Susan just read the latest rewrite of  the introduction of my book, and made a remarkable observation about ideologies. Her response was to this passage: Unfortunately, the progress I made understanding texts with obscure meanings was gained at the expense of the understandability of my own thoughts, which were becoming obscure and poetic. I found … Continue reading Ideological conversion versus metanoia

Fishbane on metanoia

Michael Fishbane describes metanoia beautifully and precisely: …But then it may happen that the thoughtless ordinariness of daily life is jolted and gives way to a more elemental specificity. Suddenly something occurs that claims us with an overwhelming intensity, and floods our sensibilities without any accompanying thoughts of its human meaning. Rather, the sense of … Continue reading Fishbane on metanoia

The temporalite

There is a type of person everyone will recognize. Everyone recognizes him because there is one of him at all times in every social circle. This kind of person wakes up one day and realizes that this truth and this reality which seems so spatially, temporally, metaphysically capacious is the slenderest experiential thread, fed through … Continue reading The temporalite

Changes of faith

In metanoia, what really happens? So much of it transpires beyond anything we can communicate. It isn’t ineffable. We can say all kinds of things about it. The problem is with being heard and understood. We are faced with an unhappy choice: We can say what makes perfect sense to our own ears, and face … Continue reading Changes of faith

It’s just an existential crisis

An existential crisis occurs when a person faces a truth that can neither be ignored nor considered. The truth cannot be ignored because it has been noticed. Now that it has been noticed, it is re-noticed wherever it applies, and it is impossible to un-notice when this new truth obtrudes. It has become part of … Continue reading It’s just an existential crisis

Natural as opposed to what?

I’ve used the word “natural” to four very different ways, and each is defined against a different opposite. These are each The first two are the boring obvious ones. Natural versus manmade. Is it from the wilderness, or is it from our own hands? Natural versus supernatural. Does it obey the laws of nature, or … Continue reading Natural as opposed to what?

Faith, doctrine and sheer bullshit

Faith is not the same as doctrine. Faith is a way of believing: faith is subject. Doctrine is what is believed: doctrine is object. Faith is not the degree of certainty in a belief. Faith is not quantitative. Faith is the quality of belief, the particular way a belief is conceived. If a doctrine is … Continue reading Faith, doctrine and sheer bullshit

How it goes

If something in my life becomes unbearably distressing and I force myself to withdraw and stop reacting and instead to recollect myself — the explicit output of this work is rarely “What you understood as bad is actually acceptable.” It is more often “It is acceptable that this bad thing is bad.” This is similar … Continue reading How it goes

Multipersonal perplexity

A. Long ago, (perhaps informed by experiences sitting in meditation?) even before I began intensive philosophical study, I adopted a psychology of “subpersonalities“. I’ve talked about it dozens of ways, but the language orbits a single conviction: our personal subjects are microcosmic societies, composed of semi-independent intuitive units. One of the main reasons I came … Continue reading Multipersonal perplexity

Who goes first?

My Jewish friend sent me this text: I’m fascinated with reconciliation. I still think the left cannot reconcile with the right… it has to come from the right. Or it won’t go anywhere, and the left’s best move is scorched earth. My reply: As you know, I often say “Jews go first,” When I say … Continue reading Who goes first?

‘Wisdom

I love words, and I love concepts. My house is stuffed with books, many of them purchased for the sake of a single perfect sentence. But this love of articulate concept is set against what has not yet been conceived or articulated, and that, in turn, is set against what is forever inconceivable and ineffable. … Continue reading ‘Wisdom

Nietzsche vs liberal theology

Thinking about religion in an appreciatively or tolerant way from a standpoint that sees itself as having overcome the need for religious belief is the furthest thing from understanding religion. This religion-appreciating standpoint — which sees intense awe or the excitement of discovery as a genuine substitute for religious feeling and the gestalt shifts resulting … Continue reading Nietzsche vs liberal theology

Changed by writing

I can feel how this process of writing a book is changing me. It is changing how I think, feel and speak, which is strange because what I believe I’m doing is conveying a philosophy I’ve been using, more or less unchanged since at least 2014 and maybe as early as 2011 (basically, once Latour … Continue reading Changed by writing

Conceptive vocabulary

I am designing a vocabulary for discussing how understanding works, with special emphasis on the relationship between existing understandings, failures of understanding (perplexities), and extremely novel understandings (epiphanies). All my subjects of interest — design, philosophy and religion — are urgently concerned with epiphanies. But each is concerned with epiphanies for different reasons, pays attention … Continue reading Conceptive vocabulary

The Click

Myriad ways to experience the world are possible, and these ways of seeing the world correspond with particular orderings of intuitive activity. * Can you perceive this dancer to be spinning clockwise and then to be spinning counter-clockwise? Can you feel what kind of effort you are making? There may be inner-chatter associated with your … Continue reading The Click

Methodic wisdom

Susan and I have been debating what wisdom is. We each felt the other’s view was incomplete. I thought her conception was overlapping too much with prudence; she thought mine reduced wisdom with mere open-mindedness. (Actually, she was right.) As we turned the question and viewed it from multiple angles, it became clear, as is … Continue reading Methodic wisdom

Fake etymologies

In Contingency, Irony and Solidarity, Rorty repeatedly busts Heidegger for inventing fake etymologies. The accusation extends beyond the incorrectness of the claims — the very impulse to excavate more primordial and immediate meanings is impugned. This is fascinating to me because I wholeheartedly share Heidegger’s love of etymologies, and Heidegger is a nasty enough son-of-a-bitch … Continue reading Fake etymologies